Skip to main content

From Charter to Change: A Rights-Informed Public Health Approach (RIPHA)

Meg Thomas 11 hours ago

Blog Influencing Policy News

This is a three-part series exploring a Rights-Informed Public Health Approach (RIPHA) and how this framework can support continuity of wellbeing for babies, children and young people from Armed Forces families.

In the words of Cadence, a young person who contributed to The Forces Children’s Rights Charter, “this is more than a document; it’s a representation of our ideas, stories, and vision for the future.”  

It is also a blueprint for better public policy. 

Too often, children’s rights are seen as something to consider after services have been designed. Public health, meanwhile, focuses on preventing poor outcomes through early intervention and system-wide action. 

Rights-Informed Public Health Approach (RIPHA) brings these approaches together, beginning with a simple proposition: if governments know that military life creates predictable experiences for children, then public systems should be designed to anticipate those experiences and protect children’s rights before disadvantages occur. 

This is not solely the responsibility of the Ministry of Defence, nor is it solely the responsibility of schools, health services or local authorities. It is a shared endeavour. 

The UK Government shapes the context in which military families live through defence policy and the Armed Forces Covenant. The governments of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland shape the public services that children rely upon every day. The voluntary sector provides expertise, advocacy and trusted relationships that strengthen communities. Together, these partners have an opportunity to create a coherent, UK-wide approach while respecting devolved responsibilities. 

The Forces Children’s Rights Charter offers practical principles to guide that work: 

  • Listen to children as partners in designing services. 
  • Recognise military life as part of children’s identities. 
  • Participation, strong relationships and flexible support are embedded in everyday practice. 
  • Have practices as standard which enables sharing of information to improve continuity. 
  • Strengthen and maintain connections to trusted adults, peers and their communities through the right support at the right time and continuity beyond service. 
  • Remove barriers before they become inequalities. 

Adopting Rights-Informed Public Health Approach would move the conversation beyond an adult-lead discussion about whether children from Armed Forces families need more support. 

Instead, it asks a more ambitious question: ‘How do we build public systems with Forces children and young people that consistently recognise, respect and protect their rights and best interests wherever Service life takes them?’ 

That question belongs to every government, every commissioner and every organisation working with children. 

The answer lies not in creating separate services, but in creating better systems with those who will use them: systems that anticipate rather than react, collaborate rather than operate in isolation, and place children’s rights at the centre of prevention to create a continuity of wellbeing. 

Children from Armed Forces families have already shown extraordinary capacity to adapt to the demands of military life. 

The challenge now is whether our public systems are prepared to adapt to them.